A survey is planned to determine the mean annual family medical expenses of employees of a large company. The management of the company wishes to be 95% confident that the sample mean is correct to witin +/- $50 of the true population mean annual family medical expenses. A pilot study indicates that the standard deviation can be estimated as $400.
a)How large a sample size is necessary?
b)If managment wants to be correct to within +/- $25, what sample size is necessary?
thanks so much!
6.47- A company wishes to be 95% confident that the sample mean is correct to witin +/- $5 ....?
I'm assuming the value of $400 is supposed to be assumed to be the population standard deviation, σ.
Recall the formula for determining the endpoints of a confidence interval for a mean, given the population standard deviation:
μ +- z* (σ / √n)
If we want to be correct within +- $50, then, it stands to reason that we want z* (σ / √n) to be equal to $50 (more specifically, less than or equal to $50).
z* = 1.96 for a 95% CI and σ = $400 as given.
Therefore,
1.96 ($400 / √n) %26lt;= $50
n %26gt;= 245.9
Note the inequality: sample size must be "greater than or equal" to 245.9, so we would round up to 246.
Then, for +- $25 accuracy, we notice that the value of z* doesn't change (still 95% CI), only the error does, so the inequality we need to solve is:
1.96 ($400 / √n) %26lt;= $25
n %26gt;= 983.4
I know it's tempting to use n = 983, but that would be incorrect. The inequality specifically says that n should be "greater than or equal to" 983.4 and so we must use n = 984. This concept makes sense conceptually as well; if n=983.4 creates a interval with error +- $25, we would expect that lowering the sample size increases the error (why else would we spend the time and effort to increase the sample size?).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment